Allegaert v. Perot’s Empirical Analysis
548 F.2d 432 · 1977
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2023 · most notably Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon (1987), Hays and Company v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc (1989)
17 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wilko v. Swan · Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. · Strong v. United States · Davis v. United States · Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Ware
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the public interest in the dispute, the degree to which the nature of the evidence ma[kes] the judicial forum preferable to arbitration and the extent to which the agreement to arbitrate [is] a product of free choice,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“wholesale fraud of institutional dimension,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Members, member firms, partners of member firms, member corporations and officers of member corporations shall arbitrate all controversies arising in connection with their business between or among themselves or between them and their customers as required by any customer’s agreement or, in the absence of a written agreement, if the customer chooses to arbitrate ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.