Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 F.2d 508 - United States v. Puma

United States v. Puma’s Empirical Analysis

548 F.2d 508 · 1977

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 1982
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Hampton v. United States · New York v. Penn Central Transportation Co. · Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist · Del Toro v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “through the creative activity of the government. The Defendant would not have had the heroin to sell if it had not been purchased by the Informer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.