United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America’s Empirical Analysis
548 F.2d 67 · 1976
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Rosado v. Wyman · Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770 · Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers · Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers · Pomponio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(w)hat Buffalo Forge establishes regarding the arbitrability of sympathy strikes is as applicable to this particular suit for monetary damages as it is to a request for injunctive relief.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“assumed that a mandatory arbitration clause implies a commitment not to engage in sympathy strikes,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““We decline to consider whether the rationale of Eazor Express would permit an employer to recover damages for the failure of a Union to take all reasonable steps to prevent the spread of an unauthorized and allegedly illegal strike against another employer. This case was not tried on that theory.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.