Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 F.2d 840 - United States v. Davis

United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

548 F.2d 840 · 1977

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
February 1992
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1992

9 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

80197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1621

Relies on Weiler v. United States · National Labor Relations Board v. Gamble Enterprises, Inc. · Gilbert v. California · Lansky v. Savoretti · Gebhard v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the materiality requirement of a perjury indictment may be met by a general statement that the matter was material.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.