United States v. Marek’s Empirical Analysis
548 F.3d 147 · 2008
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2022
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6041 · 26 U.S.C. § 7212 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Spies v. United States · Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa · United States v. Ortiz · United States v. Wilson · United States v. Klein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) corruptly, 2) endeavored, 3) to obstruct or impede the due administration of the [i]nternal [r]evenue laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[P]urely circumstantial evidence can support an inference of knowledge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.