Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 F.3d 44 - Budiono v. Mukasey

Budiono v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis

548 F.3d 44 · 2008

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
August 2022
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Scatambuli v. Holder (2009), Decky v. Holder (2009)

19 federal appellate ·

120200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Maine District Court)

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Laeila Nelson Stephanie Nelson Phil Nelson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Nikijuluw v. Gonzales · El Moraghy v. Ashcroft · Romilus v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the BIA adopts the IJ's opinion and discusses some of the bases for the IJ's decision, we have authority to review both the IJ's and the BIA's opinions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.