Vineberg v. Bissonnette’s Empirical Analysis
548 F.3d 50 · 2008
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 87 district ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Zannino · Mesnick v. General Electric Co. · Medina-Munoz v. Rj Reynolds Tobacco Company · Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc. · Mack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A fact is 'material' only if it possesses the capacity to sway the outcome of the litigation under the applicable law.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]n issue is 'genuine' if it 'may reasonably be resolved in favor of either party.'”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.