Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 F.3d 729 - Waldrip v. Hall

Waldrip v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

548 F.3d 729 · 2008

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 2024
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2024

8 federal appellate ·

120200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Lockyer Attorney General of California v. Andrade · Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York · Carey Warden v. Saffold · Bonin v. Calderon · Evans v. Chavis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a state prisoner may seek review of an adverse lower court decision by filing an original petition (rather than a notice of appeal) in the higher court, and that petition is timely if filed within a 'reasonable time.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “so waiting until [ Elizalde ] was decided does not explain the delay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[P]ublic policy strongly encourages courts to permit amendments.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.