Doody v. Schriro’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[B]ecause [Doody] filed his habeas petition after the effective date of the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), we must deny the petition unless the state court’s adjudication of [Doody’s] claims resulted in a decision that was either (1) contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States, or (2) based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Doody v. Schriro · Doody v. Ryan

2. ““In order to combat these pressures [inherent in a custodial interrogation] and to permit a full opportunity to exercise the privilege against self-incrimination, the accused must be adequately and effectively apprised of his rights and the exercise of those rights must be fully honored.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. United States v. Gonzalez

3. “necessary predicate to the finding that a confession is not 'voluntary' within the meaning of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. G.O.