Sandoval v. Ulibarri’s Empirical Analysis
548 F.3d 902 · 2008
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Olano · Crawford v. Washington · Giglio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness as measured against prevailing professional norms, and ... that there is a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different but for counsel’s inadequate performance,” Sandoval v. Ulibarri, 548 F.3d 902, 909 (10th Cir.2008). 3 . See also Brewer v. Reynolds, 51 F.3d 1519, 1523 (10th Cir. 1995) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Patton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.