548 F. Supp. 2d 596 - Beam v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 3401 (Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978) · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 2 U.S.C. § 431 (§ 301 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971) · 2 U.S.C. § 437C (§ 306 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971) · 2 U.S.C. § 437D (§ 307 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971) · 2 U.S.C. § 437E · 2 U.S.C. § 437G (§ 309 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971) · 2 U.S.C. § 441F (§ 320 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Steffel v. Thompson · Heckler v. Chaney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The [Campaign Act] provides a strong basis for scrupulously respecting the grant by Congress of 'exclusive jurisdiction' to the FEC....”). 18 . Plaintiff does not assert that he”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.