548 So. 2d 1049 - Ex Parte Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 1991
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 391 So. 2d 133 - Dolvin v. State · Day v. State · 378 So. 2d 1173 - Turner v. State · 416 So. 2d 1083 - Walker v. State · Ingram v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"This Court must review the evidence presented by the State in its most favorable light when deciding the sufficiency of the evidence. Walker v. State , 416 So.2d 1083 (Ala.Crim.App. 1982). A verdict of conviction will not be set aside on an assertion of insufficiency of the evidence unless, considering all reasonable presumptions of correctness, the preponderance of the evidence against the verdict is so decided as to clearly convince the Court that it was wrong and unjust. Johnson v. State , 378 So.2d 1164 (Ala.Crim.App.) cert. quashed, 378 So.2d 1173 (Ala. 1979). The test applied in this situation is whether the jury might reasonably find that the evidence excluded every reasonable hypothesis but guilt. See Dolvin v. State , 391 So.2d 133 (Ala. 1980)."”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Langley v. State · Brown v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.