¶2I would remand this case for the trial court to consider the propriety of setting an appropriate award of damages. See my special opinion in Clements v. Lanley Heat ProcessingEquipment, 548 So.2d 1345 (Ala. 1989).
¶3HOUSTON, J., concurs.
548 So. 2d 1352
Decided May 12, 1989
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1989-05-12
Relies on 548 So. 2d 1345 - Clements v. Lanley Heat Processing Equipment
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1989-05-12
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2008
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶2I would remand this case for the trial court to consider the propriety of setting an appropriate award of damages. See my special opinion in Clements v. Lanley Heat ProcessingEquipment, 548 So.2d 1345 (Ala. 1989).
¶3HOUSTON, J., concurs.