Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 So. 2d 584 - Williams v. State

548 So. 2d 584 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Public Broadcasting Service v. Network Project · McDougall v. North Carolina · Ex Parte Bush

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) to identify the accusation lest the accused be tried for an offense different from that intended by the grand jury, (2) to enable the defendant to prepare for his defense, (3) to allow the judgment to protect the defendant and foreclose the possibility of being twice put in jeopardy for the same offense, and (4) to enable the trial court after conviction to pronounce judgment on the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.