Zanger v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2011
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 357 So. 2d 410 - McNamara v. State · 268 So. 2d 173 - Pope v. State · 459 So. 2d 306 - Tucker v. State · Allen v. State · 283 So. 2d 99 - Metropolitan Dade Cty. Ta v. State Dept. Hs & Mv
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“concurrent jurisdiction with the state attorneys”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he office shall have such power only when such offense is occurring, or has occurred, in two or more judicial circuits as part of a related transaction, or when any such offense is connected with an organized criminal conspiracy affecting two or more judicial circuits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The general rule ... is that jurisdiction is to be determined solely from the face of the information. McLean v. State, 23 Fla. 281 , 2 So. 5 (1887); State v. Vazquez, 450 So.2d 203 (Fla.1984); Allen v. State, 463 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Brehm v. State, 427 So.2d 825 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.