548 So. 2d 808 - Wallis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]he acts charged in each information related to a different victim and an entirely separate and different factual event than that charged in each other information.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 582 So. 2d 1230 - Bierer v. State · 620 So. 2d 237 - Roark v. State

2. “As distinguished from the "union" of the defendant's sex organ with the victim's vagina or the "penetration" of the victim's vagina "by" the defendant's hand, finger, or any other object the mere "union" of the defendant's hand or finger "with" the victim's vagina does not violate the statute, although that act may violate other statutes... .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 557 So. 2d 582 - Firkey v. State

3. “state was ... required to prove that the defendant penetrated the victim's vagina with his finger.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 704 So. 2d 147 - Graves v. State