State v. Abrams’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1999
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ross · Hayes v. Lockhart · In re Disbarment of Schaefer · 539 So. 2d 464 - State v. Wells · Frazier v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IF A MOTOR VEHICLE IS LAWFULLY STOPPED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE DRIVER CONSENTS TO THE OFFICER LOOKING INSIDE THE VEHICLE, DOES THE CONSENT GIVEN EXTEND TO THE SEARCH OF CLOSED CONTAINERS WITHIN THE VEHICLE WHICH ARE NEITHER LOCKED NOR SEALED?”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“the officer searched a closed satchel-type purse located between the seats and found narcotics therein. See id. In affirming the trial court's order granting the motion to suppress, this court reasoned that the officer exceeded the scope of consent to”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jacobs v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.