Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 So. 2d 887 - Ivery v. State

548 So. 2d 887 - Ivery v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 497 So. 2d 1199 - State v. Delgado-Santos · 453 So. 2d 881 - Bek-New Chemist, Inc. v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Pharmacy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A witness's prior inconsistent statement to a police officer cannot be used as substantive evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 880 So. 2d 730 - Smith v. State
  2. “circumstantial and certainly not compelling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 854 So. 2d 666 - Neal v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.