Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 SW2D 31 - Ex Parte Flores

Ex Parte Flores’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2000

10 state decisions

501977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pearce v. State of Texas · Ex Parte Martinez · Vallejo v. State · Ex Parte Bowman · Waites v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the indictments against relator are defective under the laws of the demanding State, he can so show in that State. Such question is not one for the determination of the courts of this State.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.