Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 SW2D 310 - Coffman v. Hammer

Coffman v. Hammer’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2008

8 state decisions

401977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ewin v. Richardson · Lones v. Blount County Beer Board · Howard v. Willocks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Third, that no such beverages will be sold except at places where such sale will not cause congestion of traffic or interference with schools, churches, or other places of public gathering, or otherwise interfere with public health, safety and morals . . . .” T.C.A., § 57-205.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.