Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 SW3D 145 - Love v. Kelley

Love v. Kelley’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hobbs v. Gordon · Green v. State · Baker v. Norris · Philyaw v. Kelley · Fields v. Hobbs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless the petitioner can show that the trial court lacked jurisdiction or that the commitment was invalid on its face, there is no basis for a finding that a writ of habeas corpus should issue,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “facial invalidity of the judgment or the lack of jurisdiction by the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.