Jackson v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Heintz v. Jenkins · Thummel v. King · Johnson v. Riddle · Brown v. Hamid · Reynolds v. Diamond Foods & Poultry, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court reviews the grant of a motion to dismiss de novo. " Jackson v. Barton , 548 S.W.3d 263 , 267 (Mo. banc 2018). "This Court ... assumes all facts alleged in the petition are true and construes all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.