Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 SW3D 518 - Oliva v. State

Oliva v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Gustafson v. Alloyd Co. · Cohens v. Virginia · Boykin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he words 'punished for,' 'punishable by,' or similar language ordinarily mark an enhancing provision as a punishment issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[L]anguage in an opinion can be dictum if it is broader than necessary to resolve the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if it is shown on the trial of the offense that ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.