Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 549 F.2d 108 - United States v. Eddy

United States v. Eddy’s Empirical Analysis

549 F.2d 108 · 1976

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 1994 · most notably United States v. Bailleaux (1982), United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. Pederson (1977)

32 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

240197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 811 (§ 201 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Magna Oil Corp. v. Bateson · United States v. Knight · Jordan v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “remove any drug or other substance from the schedules if he finds that the drug or other substance does not meet the requirements for inclusion in any schedule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “add to such a schedule or transfer between such schedules any drug or other substance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.