Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 549 F.2d 306 - James Edward Craig v. Warden Sam P. Garrison, Central Prison

James Edward Craig v. Warden Sam P. Garrison, Central Prison’s Empirical Analysis

549 F.2d 306 · 1977

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
May 2013
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably Shah v. Td Hutto Oj Jm Icc Ra Ap Ss (1983), Birl v. Estelle (1981)

23 federal appellate · 2 district ·

30019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Alley v. Dodge Hotel · Evans v. Jones · James Bryant v. Marion J. Elliott, Warden of Atmore State Prison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a pro se litigant’s notice of appeal is filed within sufficient time to allow the district court to grant an extension of time upon a showing of excusable neglect, the court should not treat the notice as untimely until it has advised the litigant of the requirements of the F.R. A.P. 4(a) and provided him an opportunity to establish excusable neglect to justify the extension of time authorized by that rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.