Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 549 F.2d 910 - Proffitt v. United States

Proffitt v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

549 F.2d 910 · 1976

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
June 2010
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably United States v. Crawford (1978), United States v. Brown (1993)

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

12019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Heflin v. United States · Milanovich v. United States · United States v. Gaddis · Doherty v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the judgment of this court is adverse to the defendant, counsel shall inform the defendant, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. If the defendant, in writing, so requests and in counsel’s considered judgment there are grounds for seeking Supreme Court review, counsel shall prepare and file a timely petition for such a writ and transmit a copy to the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We follow the concurring opinion of Mr. Justice White in United States v. Gaddis”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.