Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 549 F.3d 1294 - Protocols, LLC v. Leavitt

Protocols, LLC v. Leavitt’s Empirical Analysis

549 F.3d 1294 · 2008

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
October 2022
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2022

5 federal appellate · 8 district ·

160200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1395Y (§ 1862 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 704

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency · Clinton v. City of New York · Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) an injury in fact that is both concrete and particularized as well as actual or imminent; (2) a causal relationship between the injury and the challenged conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury would be redressed by a favorable decision.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he present impact of a future though uncertain harm may establish injury in fact for standing purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he consequences of a contingent liability ... may well be actual or imminent”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.