Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 549 F.3d 296 - Johnson v. Tennis

Johnson v. Tennis’s Empirical Analysis

549 F.3d 296 · 2008

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bruton v. United States · Richardson v. Marsh · Lockyer Attorney General of California v. Andrade · George Smith Warden v. Lee Robbins

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.