Massis v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis
549 F.3d 631 · 2008
Citation profile
22 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 89 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2023 · most notably Omari v. Holder (2009), 25 I. & N. Dec. 209 - H-L-H- & Z-Y-Z (2010)
22 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Bowles v. Russell · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · Leocal v. Ashcroft · Lin Zhong v. United States Department of Justice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“application of the law to ... facts--to determine, for example, whether those facts amount to 'exceptional and extremely unusual hardship'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A court may review a final order of removal only if ... the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sriharjati v. Holder“[s]ince Bowles , courts of appeals have declined to entertain equitable exceptions to section 1252(d) 's administrative exhaustion requirement”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cabrera v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.