United States v. Corso’s Empirical Analysis
549 F.3d 921 · 2008
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably United States v. Beals (2012), Sotirion v. United States (2010)
15 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1708 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Johnson v. United States · United States v. Young · United States v. Dominguez Benitez · United States v. Vonn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Tjhis court retains subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal by a defendant who had signed an appellate waiver.”). 3 . The Government points out that the District Court technically violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 during Ali’s change of plea hearing by failing to (1) discuss specifi cally the appellate waiver with Ali, and (2) confirm that he understood that provision. See Fed.R.Crim.P. ll(b)(l)(N) (''[T]he court must inform the defendant of, and determine that the defendant understands, ... the terms of any plea-agreement provision waiving the right to appeal or to collaterally attack the sentence.”). Even if Ali had challenged this deficiency in the Court’s colloquy, we would still enforce the appellate waiver (under a plain error analysis), as we are satisfied that any deficiency in the colloquy did not affect Ali's "substantial rights.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if we conclude (1) that the issues [Damon] pursues on appeal fall within the scope of his appellate waiver and (2) that he knowingly and voluntarily agreed to the appellate waiver, unless (3) enforcing the waiver would work a miscarriage of justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“absence of any indication on the record that the defendant understood that he had a right to appeal and that he was giving up that right,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.