United States v. Deans’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2 district · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 841 (Amendments of 1973 to Federal Law) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Chimel v. California · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · New York v. Belton · Mincey v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f a cellphone is lawfully seized, officers may also search any data electronically stored in the device.”); United States v. Santillan, 571 F.Supp.2d 1093, 1104 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.