Wilson v. Parisi’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 2601 (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act) · 12 U.S.C. § 2614 · 15 U.S.C. § 1639 (§ 129 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1664 (§ 144 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · McNally v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Requisite disclosures in advertisement If any advertisement to which this section applies states the amount of the down payment, if any, the amount of any installment payment, the dollar amount of any finance charge, or the number of installments of the period of repayment, then the advertisement shall state all of the following items: (1) The down payment, if any. (2) The terms of repayment. (3) The rate of the finance charge expressed as annual percentage rate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hearns v. Parisi“It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hearns v. Parisi“If any of the following terms is set forth in an advertisement, the advertisement shall meet the requirements of paragraph (c)(2) of this section: (i) The amount or percentage of any down payment, (ii) The number of payments or period of repayment, (iii) The amount of any payment, (iv) The amount of any finance charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hearns v. Parisi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.