Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 549 So. 2d 1005 - Ranger Ins. Co. v. Bal Harbour Club

549 So. 2d 1005 - Ranger Ins. Co. v. Bal Harbour Club’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
10
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 119 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Harper v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp. (1998), 979 So. 2d 871 - United States Fire Insurance v. J.S.U.B., Inc. (2007)

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 119 state decisions — followed in 10 states

12501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 223 So. 2d 713 - Shingleton v. Bussey · 106 Wash. 2d 901 - E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. · Solo Cup Company v. Federal Insurance Company · 237 So. 2d 163 - Beta Eta House Corp., Inc. of Tallahassee v. Gregory · Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is axiomatic in the insurance industry that one should not be able to insure against one’s own intentional misconduct”);' Couch on Insurance § 39:15 (2d ed. 985) (”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Enron Oil Trading & Transportation Co. v. Underwriters of Lloyd's of London · 382 F. Supp. 2d 1349 - Waste Corp. of America, Inc. v. Genesis Ins. Co.
  2. “Id. The second factor looks to whether the purpose served by the imposition of liability for certain conduct is”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 643 So. 2d 636 - Lindheimer v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. · 889 So. 2d 779 - Travelers Indem. Co. v. PCR INC.
  3. “It is axiomatic in the insurance industry that one should not be able to insure against one’s own intentional misconduct. ... The rationale underlying this rule is that the availability of insurance will directly stimulate the intentional wrongdoer to violate the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 382 F. Supp. 2d 1349 - Waste Corp. of America, Inc. v. Genesis Ins. Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.