549 So. 2d 1357 - Antepenko v. Antepenko’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2010
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 477 So. 2d 445 - Brannon v. Brannon · 464 So. 2d 109 - Isham v. Isham · 469 So. 2d 653 - Weatherly v. Weatherly · Euler v. Euler · 489 So. 2d 592 - Phillips v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he [circuit] court should consider several factors, including the length of the marriage, the age and health of the parties, the future employment prospects of the parties, the source, value, and type of property owned, and the standard of living to which the parties have become accustomed during the marriage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Elliott“The weight or importance assigned to any one of these factors is primarily left to the trial court's discretion when apportioning property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the parties' potential for maintaining [their] standard of living after the divorce”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Elliott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.