Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

549 So. 2d 799

549 So.2d 799

14 Fla.L.Weekly 2350

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 5, 1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-10-05

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1990

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DANIEL, Chief Judge.

¶1Appellant, Curtis Johnson, appeals his conviction and sentence for unlawful sale or delivery of a controlled substance.

¶2We find Johnson’s appeal without merit, but remand to the trial court for the entry of a corrected judgment. Johnson was charged in count I of the information with unlawful sale or delivery of a controlled substance, section 893.13(l)(a)(l), which is a second degree felony. However, the written judgment stated that he was convicted of section “893.13(l)(a)(l), F-3.” The judgment should have read “893.13(l)(a)(l), F-2.” Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed but the case is remanded for correction of the scrivener’s error in the written judgment.

¶3AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected judgment.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ„ concur.
/549/so2d/799 · .json · Public domain