Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

549 So. 2d 816

549 So.2d 816

14 Fla.L.Weekly 2387

Key v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 6, 1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-10-06

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1996

4 state decisions

Relies on 438 So. 2d 1 - Palmer v. State · 376 So. 2d 59 - Counts v. State · 478 So. 2d 110 - Daniels v. Smith

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-10-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. Appellant cannot raise on direct appeal the voluntariness of his “open” no contest plea. Instead, this issue should first be presented to the trial court in a motion to withdraw that plea. Counts v. State, 376 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). As for appellant’s contention that the imposition of consecutive minimum mandatory sentences may violate Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983), the record presently before us is not sufficient for this court to make that determination. Again, appellant may raise this issue via Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Daniels v. Smith, 478 So.2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

¶2Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
/549/so2d/816 · .json · Public domain