Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 549 SO2D 95 - Ex Parte Thomas

Ex Parte Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2001

6 state decisions

40198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clemmons v. State · 431 So. 2d 1367 - Jones v. State · 56 Ala. App. 275 - Clemmons v. State · Ex Parte Lockett · Ingram v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We hold that such a claim is properly presented in a direct appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Lockett's failure to raise this issue on his appeal cannot be remedied in a Rule 20 proceeding. We must, therefore, hold that Rule 20 relief is precluded on this issue, pursuant to Rule 20.2(a)(5), and, therefore, that he was not entitled to a hearing [on his petition to the trial court for post-conviction relief]."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.