Hudson v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2005
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Perry v. Sindermann · Spitcaufsky v. Hatten · Spigelmire v. North Braddock School District · DePoortere v. Commercial Credit Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The contract between a school district and a permanent teacher [an employee certified as a teacher who has worked as a teacher for 5 years or more in the same district] shall continue known as an indefinite contract and shall be in effect for an indefinite period, subject only to: [[Image here]] (2) Modification by a succeeding indefinite contract or contracts in the manner hereinafter provided; [[Image here]] (5) Termination by the board ... after a hearing as herein provided. (Emphasis ours.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(7) “Teacher”, any employee of a school district, except a metropolitan school district, regularly required to be certified under laws relating to the certification of teachers, except superintendents and assistant superintendents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“No person shall be employed to teach in any position in a public school until he has received a valid certificate of license entitling him to teach in that position.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.