Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 549 SW2D 202 - Ex Parte Dickerson

Ex Parte Dickerson’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Ex Parte Weise (2001), State v. Yount (1993)

35 state decisions

12019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 1 Cal. 2d 611 - People v. McGee · 165 Tex. Crim. 252 - Donald v. State · 5 Cal. App. 153 - Ex Parte Vice · Cooper v. State · 16 Cal. App. 2d 709 - In Re Connolly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Usually limitation is a matter which must be asserted as a defense in civil actions and in criminal prosecutions in some jurisdictions; however, our statute provides, as do those of many other jurisdictions, that an indictment must allege the offense was committed at a time not so remote that the prosecution of the offense is barred by limitations. Article 21.02(6), V.A.C.C.P.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . if the pleading, on its face, shows that the offense charged is barred by limitations the complaint, information, or indictment is so fundamentally defective that the trial court does not have jurisdiction and habeas corpus relief should be granted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.