Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 549 U.S. 384 - Wallace v. Kato

Wallace v. Kato’s Empirical Analysis

549 U.S. 384 · 2007

Citation profile

901
cited by 901 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
17
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

166 federal appellate · 85 district · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 901 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2025 · most notably Avagyan v. Holder (2011), Manuel v. City of Joliet (2017)

166 federal appellate · 85 district · 37 state decisions — followed in 17 states

7410200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Heck v. Humphrey · Allen v. McCurry · Brown v. Illinois · Wilson v. Garcia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 901 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “detention accompanied ... by wrongful institution of legal process.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A]ccrual occurs when the plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action, ... that is, when the plaintiff can file suit and obtain relief.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the accrual date of a § 1983 cause of action is a question of federal law that is not resolved by reference to state law.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.