Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 549 U.S. 457 - Rockwell International Corp. v. United States

Rockwell International Corp. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

549 U.S. 457 · 2007

Citation profile

834
cited by 834 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

271 federal appellate · 108 district · 55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 834 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably Bowles v. Russell (2007), Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. (2007)

271 federal appellate · 108 district · 55 state decisions — followed in 11 states

6490200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1500 · 29 U.S.C. § 101 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 104 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 651 (§ 2 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970) · 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act)

Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. · Curtis v. Loether

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 834 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No court shall have jurisdiction over an action under this section based upon the public disclosure of allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, in a congressional, administrative, or Government Accounting Office report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, unless the action is brought by the Attorney General or the person bringing the action is an original source of the information.”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]hen a plaintiff files a complaint in federal court and then voluntarily amends the complaint, courts look to the amended complaint to determine jurisdiction.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Qui tam is short for ‘qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur,’ which means 'who pursues this action on our Lord the King's behalf as well as his own.’ ” Rockwell Int'l. Corp. v. United States, 549 U.S. 457 , 463 n. 2, 127 S.Ct. 1397 , 167 L.Ed.2d 190 (2007). The False Claims Act’s qui tam provision allows”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.