¶1The first count in the indictment in this cause is in the form prescribed for such a case in the Revised Code, and the demurrer to it was properly overruled.
¶2
¶3
¶4Judgment affirmed.
55 Ala. 151
Decided December 15, 1876
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1876-12-15
From tbe City Court of Selma. Tried before tbe Hon. Joña. Haralson.
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“The rule is, that the matter of exception- shall be so brought to the attention of the court, before the retirement of the jury to make up their verdict, as to enable the judge to correct any error if there be any in his instructions to them.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. Jurey
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1876-12-15
Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1962
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The first count in the indictment in this cause is in the form prescribed for such a case in the Revised Code, and the demurrer to it was properly overruled.
¶2
¶3
¶4Judgment affirmed.