Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

55 Ala. 151

Jacobson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1876

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1876-12-15

From tbe City Court of Selma. Tried before tbe Hon. Joña. Haralson.

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“The rule is, that the matter of exception- shall be so brought to the attention of the court, before the retirement of the jury to make up their verdict, as to enable the judge to correct any error if there be any in his instructions to them.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. Jurey

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1876-12-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1962

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

501876188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MANNING, J. —

¶1The first count in the indictment in this cause is in the form prescribed for such a case in the Revised Code, and the demurrer to it was properly overruled.

¶22. The charge of the court placed the case properly before the jury, for their consideration; and being a long charge, containing several distinct paragraphs, an exception to the whole does not reach any minor defect in presenting a particular proposition which is only a part of the charge. The rule is, that the matter of exception shall be so brought to the attention of the court, before the retirement of the jury to make up their verdict, as to enable the judge to correct any error, if there be any in his instructions to them. This is not done by the exception taken in the present cause.

¶33. It has been held by this court, that it will not reverse a judgment of the Circuit Court, for its refusal to give a charge asked, unless it appear by the bill of exceptions that such charge was put in writing, as the statute provides.

¶4Judgment affirmed.

/55/ala/151 · .json · Public domain