Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 Ala. App. 50 - Ellison v. State

55 Ala. App. 50 - Ellison v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 1985
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McDonald v. United States · Swenson v. Bosler · Entsminger v. Iowa · Craig v. Root · Relf v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““For the guidance for the Bench and Bar, we note here that frequently this Court does not write opinions on cases involving original appeals or on post conviction review. We are not required to do so in all cases. Title 13, Section 66, Code of Alabama 1940. “In fact we are advised by representatives of West Publishing Company that more than 4400 appellate opinions are now submitted to them each month from the various appellate courts in the United States. The fact that this Court does not write an opinion should never be construed as a ‘perfunctory review’ by this Court. Title 15, Section 389, Code of Alabama 1940. “Whenever eases in the opinion of this Court present no new, novel, or unusual legal questions, the decision usually is no more than a brief order indicating the decision in the case. Title 13, Section 66, supra. All cases submitted to this Court are considered by each member of this Court, including all briefs submitted by the attorneys or the parties. Thus, the fact that a decision only is rendered, rather than an opinion, should be given as much weight as if a full opinion had been written.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"The Supreme Court of Alabama, in Allison v. State , 281 Ala. 193 , 200 So.2d 653 (1967) was confronted with this same problem, and proceeded to accord appellate review of the original trial proceedings as therein outlined. The court also accorded review of the original trial proceedings through a `coram nobis appeal' in Aldridge v. State , 278 Ala. 470 , 179 So.2d 51 (1965). Likewise, this court has similarly accorded appellate review in Bates v. State , 52 Ala. App. 257 , 291 So.2d 315 [351] (1974)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.