Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 Ark. 574 - Hill v. Jebb

Hill v. Jebb’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1952
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1952

8 state decisions

501892190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Nor does it matter that, after an independent sale by the proprietor, the broker, without notice thereof, found a purchaser; for his agency had then expired by the terms of its creation, and, as he accepted the terms, he could not complain of the result. (Citing cases.) n“If it be a hardship that a broker who has found a purchaser should lose his commissions, the fact is due to his accepting employment liable to be terminated at any time by a sale made without his agency.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.