In re Harrell’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 348 · 11 U.S.C. § 364 · 11 U.S.C. § 503 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 545 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Allis-Chalmers Credit Corp. v. Nordyke (In Re Nordyke) · Seidle v. Tashman (In Re Jam Fine Furniture, Inc.) · Moody v. Monroeville Medical Arts Building (In Re Allegheny Nursing Service, Inc.) · Driskill v. Hutchinson, Hutchinson & Hudgins (In Re Furniture Discount Stores, Inc.) · Janssen v. Washington Hospital Center (In Re Janssen)
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.