In Re Newbern’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
1 district · 89 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently March 2007 · most notably 3 Cal. 3d 16 - In Re William M. (1970), 27 Cal. 3d 424 - Van Atta v. Scott (1980)
1 district · 89 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 54 Cal. 2d 498 - People v. Elliot · 51 Cal. 2d 177 - In Re Petersen · 175 Cal. App. 2d 862 - In re Newbern · 44 Cal. 2d 1 - In Re Chessman · Sawyer v. Barbour
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In fixing the amount of bail, the judge or magistrate shall take into consideration the seriousness of the offense charged, the previous criminal record of the defendant, and the probability of his appearing at the trial or hearing of the case....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“... the primary purpose of bail, before or after conviction, is practical assurance that defendant will attend upon the court when his presence is required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.