Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 CAL2D 698 - People v. Privett

People v. Privett’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

132
cited by 132 later decisions
4
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 117 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 132 later decisions — most recently February 2005 · most notably People v. Talley (1967), 9 Cal. 3d 788 - People v. Gale (1973)

4 federal appellate · 117 state decisions

102019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Newland · 53 Cal. 2d 407 - People v. Ingle · 44 Cal. 2d 434 - People v. Cahan · 45 Cal. 2d 755 - People v. Martin · 40 Cal. 2d 876 - People v. Daugherty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An arrest without a warrant can only be legally made if the person arrested has committed a public offense in the presence of the arresting officer or if the arresting officer has reasonable cause to believe that the person arrested has committed a felony. (Pen. Code, § 836; People v. Boyles, 45 Cal.2d 652, 655 [ 290 P.2d 535 ]; People v. Simon, 45 Cal.2d 645, 648 [ 290 P.2d 531 ].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The sanctity of a private home is not only guaranteed by the Constitutions of the United States and of our own state, but it is traditional in our Anglo-Saxon heritage. `A man's home is his castle' is, and should be, more than an empty phrase.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.