Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 CALAPP2D 13 - Carter v. Carter

Carter v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2012

14 state decisions

6019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lefrooth v. Prentice · Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co. · Adams v. Prather · Dixon Lumber Co. v. Peacock · 27 Cal. App. 2d 739 - Bertozzi v. Swisher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““He [defendant] testified that he sells drapery and upholstery goods on commission in San Francisco for two New York firms. The practice is for him to forward checks to these firms for goods sold and they in turn mail checks to him for the commissions earned. He did not recall what items made up the amount of $251.87 claimed to be exempt. He merely added up all the deposits made in his account within thirty days of the levy. He keeps no books and had no record of his earnings except his deposits and an informal record that he keeps to enable him to make an income tax return. It is obvious from this summary of his testimony that he failed to prove that any part of the sum as to which he claimed an exemption was for ‘services rendered within thirty days next preceding the levy.’ He failed completely in fact to prove when any of such services were actually rendered.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.