Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 CONNAPP 293 - In re Charles A.

In re Charles A.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 620 (§ 420 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on In re Eden F. · In re Eden F. · State v. Francis · Amica Mutual Insurance v. Woods · In re Marvin M.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “mistakes . . do not [necessarily] defeat the proposition that reasonable efforts at reunification were made.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[o]n appeal, our function is to determine whether the trial court's conclusion was legally correct and factually supported' ” (citation omitted)). . Although not essential to our decision, the origins of the”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.