State v. Grenier’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited
32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Golding · DiCarlantonio v. United States · Woodcock v. Chemical Bank · Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp. · Velasquez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Assistant State’s Attorney]: . . . [W]hen did you start seeing [S]? “[McGeehan]: In April of 1996. “[Assistant State’s Attorney]: And to this [day] ... do you continue to treat [S]? “[McGeehan]: Yes, I do. “[Assistant State’s Attorney]: And from the first time you saw her until today, approximately how may sessions have you had with [S]? “[McGeehan]: Approximately twenty-five sessions. “[Assistant State’s Attorney]: Okay. And what are you treating [S] for? “[McGeehan]: It’s a combination of her inappropriate behavior which continues today. It has to do with sexual acting out with other children, comments of a sexual nature and also to treat the trauma of the abuse that she experienced. “[Defense Counsel]: Your Honor, I’m going to object to that as conclusory and I make my same objection that I made with reference to Ms. Herwerth that— “The Court: Overruled. “[Defense Counsel]: The direction of this testimony is going to— “The Court: Overruled. “[Defense Counsel]: Thank you. Exception, please.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Grenier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.